0.11/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.12 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1200 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 15:41:54 EDT 2021 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.12/0.34 % Number of cores: 8 0.12/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.12/0.34 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.12/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied 0.12/0.34 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 0.12/0.37 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18AMC_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. 0.12/0.37 # 0.12/0.37 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.12/0.37 0.12/0.37 # Proof found! 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Theorem 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.12/0.37 thf(choiceaxii, axiom, ![X5:($i > $i) > $o]:(X5 @ (epsii @ X5)<=?[X2:$i > $i]:X5 @ X2), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', choiceaxii)). 0.12/0.37 thf(ifd, axiom, (if)=(^[X1:$o, X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:epsii @ (^[X4:$i > $i]:((X1&(X4)=(X2))|(~(X1)&(X4)=(X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ifd)). 0.12/0.37 thf(conj, conjecture, ![X1:$o, X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:((if @ (X1) @ X2 @ X3)=(X3)|(if @ (X1) @ X2 @ X3)=(X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj)). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X11:$i > $i, X1:$o, X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:(epred1_4 @ X3 @ X2 @ X1 @ X11<=>((X1&(X11)=(X2))|(~X1&(X11)=(X3)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[introduced(definition)])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X5:($i > $i) > $o]:(?[X2:$i > $i]:X5 @ X2=>X5 @ (epsii @ X5)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[choiceaxii])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X20:$i > $i, X21:$o, X22:$i > $i, X23:$i > $i]:((((~X21|X21|~epred1_4 @ X23 @ X22 @ X21 @ X20)&((X20)=(X23)|X21|~epred1_4 @ X23 @ X22 @ X21 @ X20))&((~X21|(X20)=(X22)|~epred1_4 @ X23 @ X22 @ X21 @ X20)&((X20)=(X23)|(X20)=(X22)|~epred1_4 @ X23 @ X22 @ X21 @ X20)))&((~X21|(X20)!=(X22)|epred1_4 @ X23 @ X22 @ X21 @ X20)&(X21|(X20)!=(X23)|epred1_4 @ X23 @ X22 @ X21 @ X20))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1:$o, X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:(if @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)=(epsii @ (epred1_4 @ X3 @ X2 @ X1)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ifd]), c_0_3])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X15:($i > $i) > $o, X16:$i > $i]:(~X15 @ X16|X15 @ (epsii @ X15)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X2:$i > $i, X4:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:(epred1_4 @ X4 @ X3 @ $true @ X2|(X2)!=(X3)), inference(eliminate_boolean_vars,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X12:$o, X13:$i > $i, X14:$i > $i]:(if @ X12 @ X13 @ X14)=(epsii @ (epred1_4 @ X14 @ X13 @ X12)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2:$i > $i, X4:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:(epred1_4 @ X3 @ X4 @ $false @ X2|(X2)!=(X3)), inference(eliminate_boolean_vars,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:$o, X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:(((~X1|(if @ $true @ X2 @ X3)=(X3))&(X1|(if @ $false @ X2 @ X3)=(X3)))|((~X1|(if @ $true @ X2 @ X3)=(X2))&(X1|(if @ $false @ X2 @ X3)=(X2))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X5:($i > $i) > $o, X2:$i > $i]:(X5 @ (epsii @ X5)|~X5 @ X2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:epred1_4 @ X2 @ X3 @ $true @ X3, inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i, X1:$o]:(if @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)=(epsii @ (epred1_4 @ X3 @ X2 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i]:epred1_4 @ X2 @ X3 @ $false @ X2, inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ((((~epred2_0|epred2_0)&((if @ $false @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk2_0)|epred2_0))&((~epred2_0|(if @ $true @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk2_0))&((if @ $false @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk2_0)|(if @ $true @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk2_0))))&(((~epred2_0|epred2_0)&((if @ $false @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0)|epred2_0))&((~epred2_0|(if @ $true @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0))&((if @ $false @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0)|(if @ $true @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X4:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i]:((X2)=(X3)|~epred1_4 @ X4 @ X3 @ $true @ X2), inference(eliminate_boolean_vars,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i]:epred1_4 @ X2 @ X3 @ $true @ (if @ $true @ X3 @ X2), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_14])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X4:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i]:((X2)=(X3)|~epred1_4 @ X3 @ X4 @ $false @ X2), inference(eliminate_boolean_vars,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i]:epred1_4 @ X2 @ X3 @ $false @ (if @ $false @ X3 @ X2), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_15]), c_0_14])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~epred2_0|(if @ $true @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X3:$i > $i, X2:$i > $i]:(if @ $true @ X2 @ X3)=(X2), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0|(if @ $false @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0)!=(esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X2:$i > $i, X3:$i > $i]:(if @ $false @ X2 @ X3)=(X3), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ~epred2_0, inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])])). 0.12/0.37 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24])]), c_0_25]), ['proof']). 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.12/0.37 # Proof object total steps : 27 0.12/0.37 # Proof object clause steps : 16 0.12/0.37 # Proof object formula steps : 11 0.12/0.37 # Proof object conjectures : 7 0.12/0.37 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4 0.12/0.37 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 0.12/0.37 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8 0.12/0.37 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3 0.12/0.37 # Proof object generating inferences : 4 0.12/0.37 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13 0.12/0.37 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 0.12/0.37 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.12/0.37 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.12/0.37 # Initial clauses : 18 0.12/0.37 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 5 0.12/0.37 # Initial clauses in saturation : 13 0.12/0.37 # Processed clauses : 70 0.12/0.37 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.12/0.37 # ...subsumed : 7 0.12/0.37 # ...remaining for further processing : 63 0.12/0.37 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2 0.12/0.37 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.12/0.37 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.12/0.37 # Backward-rewritten : 22 0.12/0.37 # Generated clauses : 45 0.12/0.37 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 55 0.12/0.37 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.12/0.37 # Paramodulations : 10 0.12/0.37 # Factorizations : 0 0.12/0.37 # NegExts : 19 0.12/0.37 # Equation resolutions : 2 0.12/0.37 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.12/0.37 # Propositional check models : 0 0.12/0.37 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.12/0.37 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.12/0.37 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.12/0.37 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.12/0.37 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.12/0.37 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.37 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.37 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.12/0.37 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.12/0.37 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.12/0.37 # Current number of processed clauses : 26 0.12/0.37 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6 0.12/0.37 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.12/0.37 # Negative unit clauses : 4 0.12/0.37 # Non-unit-clauses : 16 0.12/0.37 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5 0.12/0.37 # ...number of literals in the above : 10 0.12/0.37 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.12/0.37 # Current number of archived clauses : 35 0.12/0.37 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 86 0.12/0.37 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 59 0.12/0.37 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2 0.12/0.37 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15 0.12/0.37 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.12/0.37 # BW rewrite match attempts : 48 0.12/0.37 # BW rewrite match successes : 10 0.12/0.37 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.12/0.37 # Condensation successes : 0 0.12/0.37 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1192 0.12/0.37 0.12/0.37 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.12/0.37 # User time : 0.033 s 0.12/0.37 # System time : 0.001 s 0.12/0.37 # Total time : 0.034 s 0.12/0.37 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages 0.12/0.37 EOF